a viewpoint
« previous entry | next entry »
Oct. 27th, 2004 | 09:45 am
written by a US Army member, who is an alum of the same college as a friend of mine:
update: this letter originally was signed; i removed identifying information when i posted it here.
A little letter I whipped up for family and friends. Hope it does some good.
As all of you who are receiving this know by now, I have recently been "stop-lossed". I was supposed to sign out on terminal leave from my unit this morning; now, it'll be at least another year before this happens. I had wanted to wait until I was out of the uniform before saying this, but I can wait no longer. This war that I am about to return to should never have happened.
When I returned to Army service on November 6, 2001, I believed whole heartedly that I was doing the right thing. I believed, and still believe, that the war in Afghanistan was just, and I assumed that that was where I would serve. When, instead, our President decided to invade Iraq, I had my doubts, but I still believed that we were in the right. After all, the President is the Leader of the Free World, surely he has access to information I don't, so if he says Iraq threatens us, it must, right?
Yet, over the past year, we've found no weapons of mass destruction. The only terrorist connection that's stood up is the payments that Saddam gave to the families of Palestinian suicide bombers. Payments quite similar to those that our "Ally", Saudi Arabia, also doles out. Saudi Arabia, whose royal family has done more to spread Islamist fanaticism than any other group, yet who our President steadfastly clings to. It almost seems as though the Bush family cares more about protecting the interests of a tribe of feudal despots than they do about protecting ours.
Whether you call them "Missteps", "Errors", "Crimes" or "Decisive actions", Bush's deeds have indeed caused great harm to our national interests. He has squandered out moral authority. He has alienated our allies and given aid and comfort to our enemies, by giving millions of people around the world legitimate grievances with us. He has plundered our economy to enrich the elites, while using intolerance to build a power base among the masses. He has used "security" to justify imperialism abroad while attacking liberty at home. He has preached the virtues of the free market while promoting monopolism and shielding powerful corporations from accountability. He has consorted with liars, thieves, corrupt politicians and religious fanatics. He has proven his character with his actions.
John Kerry isn't perfect, by a long shot, but he's a DAMN sight better than the other guy. I'd rather have a leader who "inconsistently" changes his mind when the situation changes, then one who consistently lies. You can't call it an "intelligence failure" either. If the President hadn't pressured the Intelligence Community to accept spurious information from shady sources, there'd never have been enough support for this war to go forward.
But it did. 16,000 civilian casualties. September 11th, five times over. How do you justify that, based on the results? We had no realistic plan in place to stabilize Iraq other than relying on Chalabi's assurances that the Iraqi people would fall over themselves in their rush to greet us. The administration's plan seems to have been limited to "The Iraqis will start behaving once the market opens up and the Invisible Hand sets everything straight!" But here's a news flash: The money that's been spent over there hasn't trickled down to ordinary Iraqis. It's gone to monopolistic no-bid contracts awarded to powerful corporations with a history of malfeasance and corruption.
Over the past year and a half, life for the average Iraqi hasn't gotten any better. No Saddam, but also no reliable electricity, power, or security. If things get much worse, the Iraqi people will gladly welcome a dictator, and as so many people throughout history have done, willingly trade away their potential freedom for stability.
The only decent reason for us to stay in Iraq for one moment longer is because we have a moral obligation to fix the damage caused by this unjustified war. Part of that damage control should be never again trusting the men whose deceit and incompetence led us into it.
Anyone getting this who's planning to vote for Bush, I beg you to reconsider. If you can't bring yourself to vote for Kerry, take the time to find some third party candidate whose platform doesn't bastardize legitimate conservative values with economic piracy and imperialism. If you absolutely must vote for bush, though, I have one final request: If I do die over in Iraq, I ask that my memory not ever be used, in any way, to build support for the policies of this administration and the false conservatives that run it. I would rather be completely forgotten than support in death an agenda I opposed in life.
update: this letter originally was signed; i removed identifying information when i posted it here.
(no subject)
from:
motomuffin
date: Oct. 27th, 2004 07:06 am (UTC)
Link
Mind if I put a link to it in my LJ?
Reply | Thread
(no subject)
from:
bratling
date: Oct. 27th, 2004 07:25 am (UTC)
Link
Reply | Parent | Thread
Hmm.....
from:
own_the_room
date: Oct. 27th, 2004 09:35 am (UTC)
Link
I have a nephew in the Marines. He's been over to Iraq twice and has applied to be assigned there again. He believes in what we're doing. He wants to help the Iraqi's secure their towns and hamlets at least long enough to vote. Democracy may be short-lived there...it may revert to an Islamic state the second that we pull out but the Iraqi people will remember that we were bold, decisive and determined to give them a taste of freedom.
It's easy to sit back and take pot-shots at the President and those in power....I remember when Clinton was President. He couldn't breathe without someone pointing a finger in ridicule. Now he's considering heading the U.N. Talk about surrounding yourself with evil-doers.....
Oil vouchers, Somalia, white slavery...not to mention Saudi Arabia, the afore mentioned evil minions, who, when Clinton deals with them, will have a much better spin from the liberal press. If the oil companies would be allowed to drill domestically, this whole subject would be moot. Liberals drive SUVs, too. They want their gas at cheap prices and then have the gall to ridicule the gas providers for dealing with the devil to get it. Open up Anwar and Texas and Oklahoma for exploration and we wouldn't need the Saudis.
By the way, I want to thank Motomuffin for allowing me to express my opinions here. I know we don't always hold the same views, so her kind rebuttals are always much appreciated. I honestly feel that "We, the people" can solve all of our problems if we just talk out our views and give each other thoughtful consideration.
Reply | Thread
Re: Hmm.....
from:
bratling
date: Oct. 27th, 2004 09:51 am (UTC)
Link
This is unsigned because I removed identifying information. He signed it in his message to his fellow alumni. I did not feel it was appropriate to post identifying information, which could be used against him, when I gave his comments a larger audience in my LJ.
If they request early release based on their inability to carry out orders due to their disbelief of their validity, surely they would be discharged.
Possibly dishonorably -- try getting a job after that... I wouldn't take that risk in his shoes. Setting that aside, from other comments he has made (which I did not reproduce here), I believe that he would not feel it was appropriate for him to reneg on his commitment to serve. Even though he does not feel that the actions of his country are right, he has committed to serve as long as his country needs him, and honor demands he fulfill that self-chosen, volunteer obligation. I suspect the only thing that would persuade him to bail out would be obvious and blatant illegal orders given to him (which, as I understand it, a soldier in our country's service is required to refuse).
Liberals drive SUVs, too.
hypocritical liberals, at least. in the past couple years i've begun attending a strongly liberal UU church a few towns over from me. it's a very wealthy, upper middle class town, and most of the attendees & members reflect this. i was surprised when i realized that i almost never see a SUV in the parking lot on sundays (or weekdays). compact cars, mid-size sedans, minivans, and Subaru station wagons, mostly. (surprisingly few BMWs with big engines, too.) in my observations there and elsewhere, there seems to be a stigma against SUVs in strongly liberal circles. at least around here, SUVs are far more likely to show up in those who have no strong political opinions, are centrists or are conservatives. (this latter statement largely based on my personal observation of people in professional, white, upper middle class office environments.)
By the way, I want to thank Motomuffin for allowing me to express my opinions here. I know we don't always hold the same views [...]
and i should thank her for linking to my post in her journal. your comments are welcome, even if i don't agree with all of them. :-) thank you!
Reply | Parent | Thread
Re: Hmm.....
from:
own_the_room
date: Oct. 27th, 2004 10:38 am (UTC)
Link
I'm curious about your church....does it have a website? How do they feel about abortion? Is it a Christ-based church?
Thanks for the discourse....frankly, I'd also look askance at some overly "gung-ho slaughter the innocents, to hell with human rights" entry. In times of war as in times of peace, we must be steadfast in our defense of our freedom and in our leadership through example. There truly are times that the rest of the world is wrong and we are right.....
Reply | Parent | Thread
Re: Hmm.....
from:
bratling
date: Oct. 27th, 2004 11:02 am (UTC)
Link
*shrug* it's original and it's honest, not lefty propaganda.
I'm curious about your church....does it have a website? How do they feel about abortion? Is it a Christ-based church?
It does; was in my comment, but here it is again! regarding abortion and christ, you'll have to ask the individual members. personal beliefs such as these are not dictated by any clergy member; that would be incompatible with a personal search for truth and meaning.
Reply | Parent | Thread
Duh......
from:
own_the_room
date: Oct. 27th, 2004 11:59 am (UTC)
Link
Thanks!
Reply | Parent | Thread
(no subject)
from:
emerlion
date: Oct. 27th, 2004 10:00 am (UTC)
Link
Reply | Thread